But for the writer, I wonder if a cultural behavior that has existed for a long time in the officials, showing the self-respect of those who are attached to the phrase “parents and people”, now has to resort to the law? History has recorded a story that has been memorized for generations, that is, after Chu Van An offered “seven beheadings” (offering the beheading of seven courtiers), the king was not standard, so he went to a hidden house. He did nothing wrong, but a heart to care for the people for the country, that behavior was first of all a gentleman’s behavior, or was also said to be “the loser”, with the original meaning used in the phrase “the nation is dying, the husband is responsible”.
The trust, and the people’s belief in the value of votes for an officer they trust is broken, there is no way to hold it back. Hold on to the chair, when the chair is very precarious, what will the future mouth say about him? If you don’t resign, something is wrong.
Resigning, as the person in charge, is probably just to save personal face. And from the expression of that individual, public opinion will think that it is a cultural behavior.
Therefore, it is not possible to equate resignation and dismissal. Once, there is a law of “forced resignation”, invisible will lose the meaning of cultural behavior in this story!